Sentiment vs Fundamentals

‍For investors, the instinct after the February 20th Supreme Court ruling on tariffs was to ask the same question that has dominated trade policy coverage for the past year: what happens to the rate? But what the ruling actually changed is the legal mechanism by which tariffs can be imposed and the constraints around that authority. That change narrows the range of possible outcomes for tariffs and the resulting economic impacts, which ultimately matters most for companies, consumers and investors. <h3>What the Ruling Actually Changed</h3>The Court’s 6-3 decision effectively removed the administration’s most flexible trade tool, the broad emergency authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) that had enabled sweeping, open-ended levies with few legal guardrails and no fixed expiration. The replacement — as of now — a maximum 15% global import surcharge under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, is a statute that has<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-tariffs-section-122-legal-challenge/"> effectively never been used in modern practice</a>. It was written in the early 1970s and largely dormant since. More consequentially, it carries a hard 150-day expiration. Without an Act of Congress, those tariffs simply expire, and early signals from Capitol Hill suggest that legislatively extending them will be a significant challenge. The baseline, for now, points toward the clock functioning as a 150-day countdown to lower tariffs. While the administration retains access to other authorities for targeted measures, these are more narrowly scoped and slower to deploy than what was just overturned. With the most flexible negotiating lever now constrained, the leverage dynamic in ongoing trade negotiations has shifted in ways that introduce their own uncertainty about whether existing agreements hold. The ruling didn’t fully resolve the trade policy question, it just reframed it. One caveat worth noting: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/business/economy/trump-trade-investigations-tariffs.html?">the administration is not conceding the tariff landscape permanently</a>. Section 301 investigations — targeting countries for unfair trade practices including excess manufacturing capacity, digital services taxes, and forced labor — are expected to be announced imminently, with Treasury Secretary Bessent on record predicting tariff rates will return to pre-ruling levels within five months. Separately, the Commerce Department is pursuing Section 232 national security investigations covering batteries, chemicals, plastics, and telecom equipment. Together, these represent a broad replacement architecture. Section 301 and 232 authority is slower-moving and more legally durable than IEEPA, having survived more than 4,000 legal challenges. The 150-day Section 122 clock may matter less if these replacement tariffs are ready before it expires.<h3>Why Predictability Was Always the Real Variable</h3>‍The past year of tariff volatility was damaging to business confidence not primarily because of the rate level, but because of the wide range of possible outcomes. A set 15% tariff is a cost businesses can model. A tariff that could be a wide range of rates depending on the day or week is a different problem — one that can defer investment and supply chain decisions built around worst-case assumptions rather than actual costs. U.S. companies are generally good at adapting to a known set of rules, even ones they don’t like. The difficulty wasn’t necessarily the level of tariffs, it was the reasonable expectation that the level could change dramatically at any moment.Markets had already begun doing some of this work themselves. Since last April, markets have learned to discount whatever gets announced, treating initial positions as opening bids rather than final ones. The ruling just made that instinct official, and now has an expiration date. The equity market’s initial reaction to the ruling reflected this instinct. Markets weren’t necessarily reacting to lower tariffs as much as to a <a href="https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/state-tariffs-february-21-2026">narrower set of possible outcomes</a>. The Court’s decision reduced the scope for open-ended escalation and replaced it with a temporary, more constrained framework. The<a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/23/trump-15percent-global-tariff-europe-eu-uk-reaction.html"> European Parliament's pause on the trade deal ratification</a> makes the same point from the other direction: negotiating against unlimited tariff authority was itself an obstacle. A more limited U.S. hand is easier to negotiate with, even at a potentially higher base rate.<h3>‍On Refunds: Legally Clear, Economically Uncertain</h3>The legal basis is no longer speculative — <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/06/trump-trade-tariffs-refunds-customs-border-protection.html">The U.S. Customs and Border Patrol's own court filings confirm roughly $166 billion in IEEPA tariffs collected across more than 330,000 importers.</a> Judge Richard Eaton, designated to oversee all refund litigation at the Court of International Trade, has ordered payment with interest, noting that approximately $650 million is accruing each month and that total interest could reach $10 billion by the end of the year if payments aren’t refunded. The practical timeline is another matter. CBP says it needs 45 days to build out the automated system required to process what amounts to 53 million separate entries — putting the earliest refunds around late April. The administration could still appeal Eaton’s order to the Federal Circuit, which would push that further. The path from legal entitlement to actual cash remains long, and the potential refunds — roughly 0.5% of GDP — complicates the deficit picture enough to keep some upward pressure on longer-duration yields in the meantime.<h3>What This Means for Investors</h3>The temptation in moments like this is to let trade policy noise crowd out the economic variables that actually drive markets over time. Last week’s ruling didn’t change the near-term path for earnings growth, productivity, or consumer health. Those are the variables that still matter.The other important consideration is the impact on inflation expectations and employment growth, the dimensions most important to the Fed. The Fed had already signalled that it felt inflationary pressures from tariffs were temporary. The ruling does not change that assessment as even if the level of tariffs change, it will be in a more narrow range. Employment growth is likely less impacted by trade policy shifts relative to the strength of the economy and change in productivity.Ultimately, it is these fundamentals that will determine where markets go from here.&nbsp;For investors, a few things are worth acting on. With escalation risk off the table, the case for staying diversified is stronger than it was a week ago. Within U.S. equities, companies that spent the past year building supply chain flexibility are better positioned than those still waiting for clarity. That adaptability is now a competitive advantage. On fixed income, the picture is more nuanced. Some upward pressure on longer-duration yields is a reasonable expectation as lost tariff revenue and $150B in refunds could worsen the federal budget deficit. How the incoming Fed chair frames the inflation picture in his first months will matter more for the optimal duration profile than the tariff ruling itself.What has changed is the nature of the central question, from “how high can tariffs go, and how fast?” to “can the administration replace what the Court took away?” The tariff question isn’t resolved, but it’s operating within tighter legal constraints and slower timelines than before. For investors, that’s a meaningfully different risk environment than the one they were navigating a month ago.

Tariffs, Trade, and the Predictability Problem

Rewards and Risks

Steve Dean

Tim Hamilton

Brent Myers

Aaron Foster

Aaron Schomer

Adam Coleman

Alex Ricke

Andy Park

Beau Simon

Boyan Doytchinov

Brad Porter

Brandon Wyand

Charlotte Jones

Cole Schmitt

David Pender

Dimitry Farberov

Gabriel Garcia

Hali London

Ian Wymore

Jack McCaddon

James Taylor

Jan Shull

Jared Mejstrik

Jesse Porter

Joleen Scheer

Jonny Jonson

Joseph Devorak IV

Kaitlin Jones

Kevin Lors

Kevin Mann

Kristen Smith

Kyle Rudduck

Lindsey O'Neil

Marcel Pfister

Marco Miranda

Mark Mooring

Mark Patzer

Matt Faubion

Mike O'Connor

Nate Bengali

Nicholas Garcia

Patrick Scherer

Rachel Buffalo

Reed Nothwang

Scott D. Hedgcock

Scott Ward

Scott Weigel

Shannon Lynch

Sheila Ryan

Tammy Johns

Tara Shulman

Tim Couture

Todd Rowe

Tony Golden

Tyler Coder

Wendy Jankoski

Wiley Belknap

Willem Bloemsma

William (Bill) LeBoeuf

Join Scott Ward, SVP Wealth Advisor at Compound, and Lauren Speidel, AVP and Regional Manager at Exeter 1031 Exchange Services, for a live breakdown of one of the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tax strategies available to real estate investors.🗓️ Date: Thursday, April 23&nbsp;🕚 Time: 11am PT / 2pm ETA 1031 exchange lets you defer capital gains taxes when you sell investment property — but the timeline is unforgiving. Miss either the 45-day identification window or the 180-day closing deadline, and the tax deferral disappears entirely.What they'll cover:<ul><li>• What a 1031 exchange actually is (and what it isn't)</li><li>• The 5 steps to prepare before your property hits the market</li><li>• How Delaware Statutory Trusts can provide flexibility and a backup when deals fall through</li><li>• Financing and cash flow considerations most investors overlook</li><li>• How to build a long-term exit strategy into your exchange from day one</li></ul>Don't miss this if you own investment real estate and want to protect your capital when it's time to sell.Can't join live? Register to get the recording.

The 1031 Exchange The Tax Strategy Every Real Estate Investor Should Know

Join Compound CIO Steve Dean, CFA® and Principal Wealth Advisor Tara Shulman for a live discussion of Steve's latest market analysis. 🗓️Date: Thursday, April 9 🕚Time: 11am PT / 2pm ET What they'll cover:<ul><li>• Equity performance and where leadership is shifting</li><li>• Fixed income, private credit, and alternatives</li><li>• The macro backdrop shaping the outlook</li><li>• What it all means for how you're positioned</li><li> Don't miss this if you want to understand how markets are performing and what it means for your portfolio. Can't join live? Register to get the recording.</li></ul>

State of the Market Q2 2026

Tender offers are becoming more common — and most employees make the call without knowing what they're really deciding. Join Compound Planning advisors Nicholas Garcia, CFP® and Gabriel Garcia for a Compound Conversation on the decisions that actually determine your outcome when a tender window opens. You'll learn: <ul class="list-disc m-4"> <li>Why it matters which shares you sell and how timing affects what you keep</li> <li>How to model out different selling scenarios to understand the real tax and cash impact</li> <li>Why your decisions should be based on your own situation, not what colleagues are recommending</li> <li>What to do once the window closes, including estimated taxes, diversification and next steps</li> </ul> Whether you're at a company actively running a tender or just want to be ready when one comes, you'll walk away knowing what questions to ask and what strategies most people never consider.

The Tender Offer Strategies Most Employees Miss

Join us for a Compound Conversation featuring our Chief Investment Officer, Steve Dean, CFA®, and Principal Wealth Advisor, Tara Shulman.​​📆 Date: Thursday, January 8th 🕚 Time: 11am PT / 2pm ET​We’ll explore key developments across public and private markets, geographies, industries, and asset classes so you can cut through the noise of recent economic and market activity and focus on what matters most.​​Whether or not you're a seasoned investor, this insightful discussion shouldn’t be missed.

State of the Market Q1 2026

2025 has brought one of the most significant tax overhauls in recent memory — the Big Beautiful Bill. And for once, there’s still time to plan before year-end.Join Jonny Jonson, CFP®, CPA, and Todd Rowe, CFP®, CPA, for a Compound Conversation about how to navigate the new tax landscape.They’ll unpack what’s changed, what’s coming next, and how you can take advantage of the planning window before December 31.Whether you’re a founder, executive, business owner, or retiree, you’ll walk away knowing exactly which levers to pull to minimize taxes, manage brackets, and make smarter giving and investment decisions this year.You’ll learn:<ul class="editor-list-ul"><li value="1" class="editor-listitem">The key provisions of the Big Beautiful Bill and how they affect income, investments, and deductions</li><li value="2" class="editor-listitem">Year-end strategies for high- and low-income years — from charitable giving to deferral timing</li><li value="3" class="editor-listitem">How to manage your 2025 and 2026 brackets to plan around the new tax brackets</li><li value="4" class="editor-listitem">Common pitfalls and deadlines that could cost you if overlooked</li></ul>

Your 2025 Year-End Tax Guide

Compound helps entrepreneurs, professionals, retirees, and families achieve their financial goals. You can think of us as your family office — a single place to manage your taxes, investments, and borrowing. We support your goals and help you make better financial decisions.

We start by cataloging your assets and understanding your goals. Then we use our software to build a multi-year financial plan with you. Once you’ve made a plan, we help you achieve it by managing the time-consuming work for you—coordinating with attorneys and bank representatives, helping you make capital calls, etc.

Compound provides entrepreneurs, professionals, retirees, and families with financial advice, tax advice, tax filing, retirement planning, estate planning, public equities investing, alternative asset investing, philanthropic planning, stock option financing, portfolio lines of credit, document management, and balance sheet tracking.

We work with entrepreneurs, business owners, professionals, retirees, and families, and we don’t have a minimum asset requirement to become a client. If you think you might be a fit, get in touch.

We want to help you achieve your goals over the next year — and for the next 5 years, 10 years, and decades into the future. Compound Planning’s approach to financial planning is personalized and goal-oriented, specializing in the unique needs of entrepreneurs, professionals, retirees, and families. We leverage purpose-built modeling software to help you forecast your IPO, estate plans, retirement and diversification strategies.

Yes. Compound and Compound’s licensed financial advisers are all fiduciaries, meaning that they are legally obligated to prioritize your finances above all else.

When you work with a Compound Planning advisor, you have access to top custodians — like Fidelity, Schwab, and more. We'll help you choose the right custodian partner for you depending on your specific needs and circumstances. 

Yes. We offer tax advising, planning, and filing services to entrepreneurs, professionals, and retirees. We specialize in helping folks with topics like options-exercising, charitable giving, and capital call tracking.

We provide our clients with investment opportunities across public and alternative markets, including venture capital, real estate, private equity, and fixed income, among others.

Compound Planning’s expert advisory team has experience supporting clients in 

all sorts of vehicles for transferring wealth

, including revocable and irrevocable trusts (e.g. 

 (GRATs), and work with many law firms if needed to achieve your wealth transfer goals. 

Get Started

Modern wealth management for

How we measure success